<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beefing up the Consumer side</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.macsales.com/2544-beefing-up-the-consumer-side/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.macsales.com/2544-beefing-up-the-consumer-side</link>
	<description>Everything OWC and Newer Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Hollatz</title>
		<link>http://blog.macsales.com/2544-beefing-up-the-consumer-side/comment-page-1#comment-1863</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Hollatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=2544#comment-1863</guid>
		<description>Thanks Chris,

I already use one in my home network. I was just wondering if there was an advantage of using Snow Leopard Server over regular Snow Leopard. Your post and others I&#039;ve read makes it sound like there really isn&#039;t an advantage in a home network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Chris,</p>
<p>I already use one in my home network. I was just wondering if there was an advantage of using Snow Leopard Server over regular Snow Leopard. Your post and others I&#8217;ve read makes it sound like there really isn&#8217;t an advantage in a home network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Beutler</title>
		<link>http://blog.macsales.com/2544-beefing-up-the-consumer-side/comment-page-1#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Beutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=2544#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll second the motion on the lack of an integrated Blu-Ray disc player on the new iMacs.  I got all excited about the new widescreen and the hype about HD resolution and greater, but who cares if the movies you watch are just upscaled 480 resolution.  And you can&#039;t watch OTA HD DTV content without some third party add-on.  So why bother with 16X9, glossy screen, and HD resolution, when you will be looking at traditional computer screen fare almost all the time.  Apple missed the boat on this one or else they are laying the ground work for something in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll second the motion on the lack of an integrated Blu-Ray disc player on the new iMacs.  I got all excited about the new widescreen and the hype about HD resolution and greater, but who cares if the movies you watch are just upscaled 480 resolution.  And you can&#8217;t watch OTA HD DTV content without some third party add-on.  So why bother with 16X9, glossy screen, and HD resolution, when you will be looking at traditional computer screen fare almost all the time.  Apple missed the boat on this one or else they are laying the ground work for something in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OWC Chris S.</title>
		<link>http://blog.macsales.com/2544-beefing-up-the-consumer-side/comment-page-1#comment-1842</link>
		<dc:creator>OWC Chris S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=2544#comment-1842</guid>
		<description>Ron,

Hardware-wise, the server mini is essentially the same as the current mid-line mini. There are really only two differences: one hardware and one software.

The software is Snow Leopard Server vs. the regular version of Snow Leopard. I don&#039;t generally deal on the server end (outside of very basic file sharing) so I really can&#039;t comment with any authority. As far as I can tell from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/features/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Apple&#039;s site&lt;/a&gt;, it comes into play more in an office environment, where collaboration and sharing of resources is key.

Hardware-wise, the difference is, as I mentioned in the article, the use of dual internal drives, at the expense of an optical drive. In a server situation, it would be logical to assume that there is a need for more storage options. By having two internal drives, a mirrored or striped array can be set up for redundancy or speed, respectively. 

If, however, you were asking why a mini instead of another form factor, the mini&#039;s size, energy use and overall cost are generally lower than other Mac options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron,</p>
<p>Hardware-wise, the server mini is essentially the same as the current mid-line mini. There are really only two differences: one hardware and one software.</p>
<p>The software is Snow Leopard Server vs. the regular version of Snow Leopard. I don&#8217;t generally deal on the server end (outside of very basic file sharing) so I really can&#8217;t comment with any authority. As far as I can tell from <a href="http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/features/" rel="nofollow">Apple&#8217;s site</a>, it comes into play more in an office environment, where collaboration and sharing of resources is key.</p>
<p>Hardware-wise, the difference is, as I mentioned in the article, the use of dual internal drives, at the expense of an optical drive. In a server situation, it would be logical to assume that there is a need for more storage options. By having two internal drives, a mirrored or striped array can be set up for redundancy or speed, respectively. </p>
<p>If, however, you were asking why a mini instead of another form factor, the mini&#8217;s size, energy use and overall cost are generally lower than other Mac options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel R</title>
		<link>http://blog.macsales.com/2544-beefing-up-the-consumer-side/comment-page-1#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=2544#comment-1832</guid>
		<description>The newest MacBook seems a much better value than the 13in MacBook Pro. It has a larger hard disc but doesn&#039;t have the expansion slot or FireWire port.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The newest MacBook seems a much better value than the 13in MacBook Pro. It has a larger hard disc but doesn&#8217;t have the expansion slot or FireWire port.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian G.</title>
		<link>http://blog.macsales.com/2544-beefing-up-the-consumer-side/comment-page-1#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=2544#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>The new iMac features look nice, though I&#039;m still far too content with my late 2007 iMac to spring for an upgrade.  Also, the feature I&#039;ve most been hoping to see in new Macs--an integrated Blu-Ray disc player--is still conspicuously absent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new iMac features look nice, though I&#8217;m still far too content with my late 2007 iMac to spring for an upgrade.  Also, the feature I&#8217;ve most been hoping to see in new Macs&#8211;an integrated Blu-Ray disc player&#8211;is still conspicuously absent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.macsales.com/2544-beefing-up-the-consumer-side/comment-page-1#comment-1829</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=2544#comment-1829</guid>
		<description>I had a wireless mouse several years ago (maybe five or more) and didn&#039;t like the extra weight, the pause when you first moved it after not moving it for a minute or two, and searching for a new battery when the old one died.

But I&#039;ll try the new wireless keyboard and mouse on these new iMacs. I can always go back to a wired keyboard and/or mouse if I don&#039;t like them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a wireless mouse several years ago (maybe five or more) and didn&#8217;t like the extra weight, the pause when you first moved it after not moving it for a minute or two, and searching for a new battery when the old one died.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll try the new wireless keyboard and mouse on these new iMacs. I can always go back to a wired keyboard and/or mouse if I don&#8217;t like them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Hollatz</title>
		<link>http://blog.macsales.com/2544-beefing-up-the-consumer-side/comment-page-1#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Hollatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=2544#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>So what&#039;s the advantage of 10.6 server on a mini vs. beefing up one of the lower price models?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s the advantage of 10.6 server on a mini vs. beefing up one of the lower price models?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OWC Mike H.</title>
		<link>http://blog.macsales.com/2544-beefing-up-the-consumer-side/comment-page-1#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>OWC Mike H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=2544#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>Also would like to point out that the display in the MacBook is claimed to be the same as the &quot;Pro&quot; line now. Of course, we&#039;ll wait to see if true, but that could be a huge improvement in screen quality that was much needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also would like to point out that the display in the MacBook is claimed to be the same as the &#8220;Pro&#8221; line now. Of course, we&#8217;ll wait to see if true, but that could be a huge improvement in screen quality that was much needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

